A twitter user has taken to his page to make an analysis of the information given by Angela Okorie, over an alleged assassination attempt on her life over the weekend.
According to the user, identified as @tweetmopol, although there are convincing indications that there was indeed an attack on Okorie, there are inconsistencies in her narration which makes the attack doubtful.
In a thread of tweet, he made his analysis which suggested that the narration of the attack was completely different from the evidence provided by Angela.
He tweeted;
I saw Angela Okorie’s videos. I sympathize with her but one thing glaring is that her narration and evidence don’t correlate at all.
Let’s start by stating the information she gave. She said she was attacked by assassins, they sprayed bullets for 30 minutes. No help came. She showed the aftermath videos of her self, her car, her xray.
As someone whose close relatives have escaped assassination. And lost a family friend to them, I know they don’t spend 30 minutes on a target they can finish off in 2 mins. Its armed robbers that may waste such time cos they are trying to steal as much as they can.
READ ALSO: Tony Elumelu Gets $5 Million From AFDB To Fund Additional 1000 Youth Entrepreneurs
The only time even armed robbers spend such time spraying bullets is when robbing a bullion van or bank. Looking at the way the glasses shattered, it’s unlikely to be bullet proof. So the 30 minutes shooting sounds weird.
Let’s go into details. There is no scratch or bullet mark on the body of the car in a 30 mins gunfire. This means that either they were shooting at close range, they target very good or the glasses were not broken by bullets
This is how they usually look in Xray. Almost white.
It brings the question again. If it was 1 or 2, they would have left her dead or in critical condition. And the biggest question, the glasses were broken, they had full access to the car, why didn’t they finish the job. How come the windscreen wasn’t damaged.
Now to the part that first caught my attention. The X-ray. Pellets have very high density and are distinct from bones in xrays. What I saw is either not metal pellets or the xray was of poor quality. And as you can see, they’re just hanging above the skin, no penetration.
Definitely there was an attack. But not just as it was narrated. Actually Very different from what was narrated.
Leave a Reply