CCT judgement: Onnoghen rejects verdict, heads to appeal court


Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

The suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria, Walter Onnoghen, has rejected the verdict of the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT).

Danladi Umar, the CCT chairman, had on Thursday convicted  Onnoghen on six counts preferred against him by the federal government.

In his ruling, Umar ordered that Onnoghen be removed from the office of CJN and banned from holding public office for 10 years.

He also ordered the forfeiture of the money in the five accounts which the defendant failed to declare as part of his assets

However, Onnoghen’s lawyers swiftly filed a notice of appeal at the appellate court in Abuja to challenge the ruling of the tribunal.

In the appeal filed by Adeboyega Awomolo, Chris Uche, Okon Efut, Ogwu Onoja and George Ibrahim, counsels to him, Onnoghen said tribunal erred when it dismissed his application.

“The appellant was at the time the charges were filed on the 11th of January, 2019 before the lower tribunal a judicial officer and was not subject to the jurisdiction of the lower tribunal,” Onnoghen said in ground one.

In ground two, he asked the CCT chairman to recuse himself from further proceedings.

“Once an allegation of real likelihood of the bias is raised the court or tribunal will have nothing more to say except to wash its hands from further proceedings in the matter.”

In ground sixteen, Onnoghen said the tribunal erred when it placed on the defendant the burden of proving his innocence which according to him is a violation of section 36 (5) of the constitution.

“The onus was on the prosecution to prove that that the defendant did not declare and submit his assets declaration form to the Code of Conduct Bureau for over 11 years as charged,” he said.

The Cable reports that Onnoghen requested the following reliefs:

  • An order allowing this appeal.
  • An order that the lower tribunal lacks jurisdiction to entertain the case.
  • An order that the lower tribunal ought to have recused itself from proceedings before it.
  • An order that the charge has become academic
  • An order setting aside the conviction of the appellant.
  • An order setting aside the order for forfeiture of assets made by the honourable tribunal.
  • An order discharging and acquiting the appellant.

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.