Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) Abubakar Malami has accused Okoi Obono-Obla, Former Chairman of the Special Investigation Panel for the Recovery of Public Property (SPIP) of investigating 50 cases illegally.
This accusation was contained in a report that was submitted to the office of the Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo.
According to The Nation, AGF Malami revealed how he investigated 10 petitions against the former SPIP Chairman, one of the petitions came from the House of Representatives,
After thorough investigations were conducted by the Attorney-General, Obono-Obla was found guilty of abuse of power, intimidation and harassment of innocent citizens.
Okoi Obono-Obla has vanished into thin air ever since the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) declared him wanted
“Contrary to the fact that the Panel is an investigative panel by its enabling law, which lacks prosecutorial powers, Mr. Obla has unlawfully engaged lawyers to file charges against suspects without any recourse to the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation,” the letter read.
“Your Excellency may recall the unauthorised investigation of several judges, initiated by Mr. Obla through the issuance of notices to them to declare their assets, an obligation which these Honourable Judges had hitherto complied with through the authorised agency – the Code of Conduct Bureau.
“This impudent and embarrassing action incurred the disapproval of Your Excellency, the Vice President and the subsequent suspension of the Chairman, Mr. Obla in 2017 via the State House letter Ref No. SH/OVP/DCOS/FMJ/0424 dated 20 October 2017 ‘Annexure L’ and further necessitated my office writing to the Honourable Judges to recall the said notices.
ALSO READ – NDDC Scam: One Senator got paid for 300 Contracts, Executed none – Interim Committee
“This singular act by the Chairman of the Panel could easily have been misconstrued as a form of intimidation and interference by the Executive on the Judiciary, contrary to the principles of separation of power.
“It is evident from the present petitions and several other petitions that the Chairman of the Panel has not in any form complied with the enabling law of the Panel as communicated to him, reneged with the directives of the Presidency with grave and audacious impunity. Indeed, none of the investigations appear to have been authorised by the Presidency, a clear contravention of the Panel’s enabling law.”
Leave a Reply