The House of Representatives has said it is ready to debate the former Minister of Education, Mrs. Oby Ezekwesili publicly on the issue of controversial jumbo pay of its members and senators.
Ezekwesili had while speaking at a dialogue on the cost of governance in Nigeria on Monday stated that the National Assembly had consumed over N1.1trillion since 2005.
This had elicited sharp reactions from both chambers of the National Assembly, who accused her of blackmail and using false figures which failed to capture the cost of capital projects and the cost of running the bureaucracy of the legislature, among others.
Ezekwesili took it further on Wednesday by challenging the National Assembly to a public hearing on the issue.
She had said, “I wish to state with absolute respect for our lawmakers and our institution that it will be more valuable and enriching for our democracy if instead of the abusive language in their recent reaction, the National Assembly immediately offer me and the rest of the Nigerian public, the opportunity of a public hearing on their budgetary allocation and the very relevant issue of their remuneration.
“Doing so would be consistent with global practice across countries of the world, where emphasis is on tenets of Open Budget to enable citizens to track to the disaggregated level all use of public resources across every arm and level of government.”
On Thursday, the House said it was ready for the challenge but added that the former minister had questions to answer.
A statement in Abuja by the Deputy Chairman, House Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Mr. Victor Afam-Ogene, said because the legislature believed in transparency in governance, “the 7th House of Representatives wholeheartedly welcomes her request for a public hearing on the stated ideals.”
However, the House noted that Ezekwesili should be prepared to explain her understanding of cost of governance and why she narrowed it to the National Assembly, leaving out the Executive.
The statement observed that her comments dwelt more on the salaries and allowances of lawmakers, excluding other expenditure like capital projects and the cost of running the bureaucracy of the legislative institution.
According to the House, this created the impression that all the funds allocated to the National Assembly in successive budgets since 2005 were spent on the payment of legislators’ wages.
The statement reads in part, “Nigerians would remember that in the course of a similar misadventure in January 2013, Mrs. Ezekwesili had made wild claims bordering on the alleged frittering of $45bn of the country’s external reserves, and $22bn in the excess crude account.
“While she has yet to fully justify those allegations, the former minister is this time seeking a fresh sparring partner in the Legislature.
“If it were not so, why would an address which centered on a “Cost of Governance in NIgeria” be curiously limited to an inquest into the operations of the National Assembly, leaving out the other two arms of government (the Executive and Judiciary) and arriving at the rather simplistic suggestion of the introduction of a unicameral or part-time legislature as the panacea for all Nigeria’s problems?
“Since it is public knowledge that whosoever wishes to go to equity ought to do so with clean hands, we restate our earlier posers which Mrs. Ezekwesili conveniently glossed over in her latest statement on this issue, to wit: What is the percentage of the National Assembly’s N150bn allocation in a budget of N4.9tr?
“Is it right to insinuate that the budgetary allocation for the National Assembly is for ‘members’ salaries and allowances’, while deliberately leaving out capital projects component, salaries of legislative aides and the bureaucracy, as well as allied institutions such as the Institute for Legislative Studies?
“What is the total disbursement to the Executive and the Judicial arms of government over the same eight-year period?
“For an ex-official of government, who between the 2006 and 2007 federal budgets, superintended over a total of N422.5bn as Education Minister, what percentage of the public fund was expended by her as recurrent cost?”
Ezekwesili had thrown a similar challenge at The Presidency in March this year after a controversy ensued following her comments that the Yar’adua-Jonathan government had squandered $64bn of foreign reserves since 2007.
However, the Presidency did not take her up on the offer, and instead, engaged her in a war of words in the media.
Leave a Reply