Plateau governor reveals how Jonathan budgeted N10bn for Ruga settlement

5 Min Read
Lalong

The Plateau State Governor, Simon Lalong, has disclosed that former President Goodluck Jonathan budgeted N10 billion for the implementation of the Ruga settlement policy that is now a subject of controversy.

According to him, the Jonathan administration budgeted the sum but it was never released.

Lalong, who spoke with State House correspondents shortly after meeting President Muhammadu Buhari in Abuja on Monday, said that had the funds been released, the recent herdsmen/farmers clashes across the country might never have happened.

The Plateau Governor said, “The fact that federal government is bringing subsidy was a request from the committee chaired by Mr Vice President. Goodluck Jonathan did it and he budgeted about N10 billion but we didn’t see the money. If he had done that at that time, we would not be fighting insecurity between herders and farmers today.”

He said it was false that the Federal Government was forcing states to be part of the policy, saying that the Ruga settlement was being implemented only in states that indicated interest in participating.

Lalong also revealed that Ruga was not the general name across such states, revealing that each state adopted any name that suited it.

Furthermore, the governor said that a committee headed by Vice President Yemi Osinbajo on the herdsmen/farmers clashes had recommended ranching as the most viable solution to the crisis.

Read Also: TY Bello reveals she was raped at the age of seven

He said that the controversy generated by the implementation of the Ruga settlement was therefore needless.

He said, “I am a member of the food security committee. I am a member of the herdsmen/farmers committee. We’ve gone a long way on this issue and we’ve said that the only solution that can address some of these insecurity issues between herdsmen and farmers is the ranching policy. You remember that one time we some people called it colony and called it this and that, and it created controversy.

“Again, we have gone far under the leadership of Mr Vice President, and then we are hearing other terms, what they are talking about it’s the same thing that we are talking about. But I think when they mentioned Ruga, it may be particular to a particular tribe but what we are doing is all encompassing, it’s for the benefit of Nigeria.

“I have said particularly in my state that animal husbandry, livestock rearing is not a prerogative of one tribe, everybody must get involved in it and that is what we have done in our state when we registered for it. We said we are going to put these structures to enable us to encourage youth, train youth. Right now we are training permanent secretaries, retired civil servants who would also get involved in it so that we can address some of the insecurity that we have in the nation.

“So when somebody mentioned another word, people would not wait to question and find out who and who are bringing those words, that is just the simple fact. But if you go to what we have done because they have mentioned some states which are included, yes, those states applied, those states said we have land for it. It’s not federal government that is imposing it on any state.

“To the credit of Mr President, he has not imposed that on any state; it was voluntary. And they said any state that is prepared to do that to address insecurity in his state should come and apply. So some of the states applied and we are at the level of the pilot scheme and some mischief makers would start bringing terms to cause confusion in the country. It’s very unfortunate.”

Watch video: 

Share this Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.