Tribunal strikes out motion to serve Buhari, INEC, APC

4 Min Read
Pic. 28. President Muhammadu Buhari makes his acceptance speech during presentation of Certificate-of-Return to him as winner of 2019 Presidential election, by Chairman of INEC, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu (L), at the International Conference Centre in Abuja on Wednesday (27/2/19). 01783/27/2/2019/Callistus Ewelike/HB/BJO/NAN Centre in Abuja on Wednesday (27/2/19). 01782/27/2/2019/Callistus Ewelike/HB/BJO/NAN

The Presidential Election Petition Tribunal on Thursday struck out the motion ex-parte, filed by Hope Democratic Party (HDP) to serve President Muhammadu Buhari, by pasting the petition at the Aso Villa Presidential office.

NAN reports that HDP and its presidential candidate, Mr Ambrose Owuru are challenging the legality of the election earlier slated for Feb. 16 but later shifted to Feb. 23.

The three-man panel  led by Justice Abdul Aboki, struck out the case, following an application filed by HDP counsel, Mr Yusuf Ibrahim.

Ibrahim informed the tribunal that the petitioner was withdrawing the motion.

He also informed the tribunal that the petitioner will file the motion whenever it wants to.

NAN reports that the tribunal fixed Thursday for hearing of the motion filed by Ibrahim, seeking an order of the court to serve President Buhari by pasting the petition at the Aso Villa Presidential office, the National Secretariat of the APC and the tribunal’s notice board.

The ex-parte motion followed an affidavit of non-service deposed to by one Abubakar Mohammed, Chief Bailiff of the Court of Appeal.

The bailiff claimed that security personnel at Aso Villa denied him access to enter and effect service on President Buhari on the grounds that there was no directive from the president’s office to that effect.

Read Also: Pregnant woman drags husband to court to know status of their union

The petitioner, who claimed to have been excluded from participating in the Feb. 23 poll, averred that the election was invalid by reason of non compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act 2010 which stipulated the conditions under which an election could be lawfully postponed.

Their major contention is that they were validly nominated for the 2019 general election, but were unlawfully excluded from the elections by INEC by delisting their names and party logo from the ballot papers.

The petitioners maintained that they will at the trial, lead evidence and rely on the law in support of their petitions to establish that the shifting of the election from Feb. 16 to 23 was without the backing of law.

The petition marked CA/EPT/PRE/001/2019 is praying the tribunal to nullify the purported election of Feb. 23 and the subsequent declaration of Buhari as the winner on the grounds that INEC has no power under any law to shift the Feb. 16 date to Feb. 23.

They are also saying that the election was invalid by the reason of non compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act stipulating the conditions under which election can be lawfully postpone.

The petitioners also claimed that they were unlawfully excluded from Participating in the Feb. 23 poll, their party logo and names were de-listed by INEC from the ballot paper after been nominated for the 2019 general election. (NAN)

TAGGED: , , ,
Share this Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.