IPOB appeals proscription order

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

The Indigenous People of Biafra, on Thursday, filed five grounds of notice of appeal before the Court of Appeal in Abuja, to challenge the decision of the Federal High Court in Abuja, proscribing it and designating it as a terrorist group.

The group filed the appeal even as its leader, Mr. Nnamdi Kanu, has not been seen in public since September 2017.

The acting Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice Abdu Kafarati, had at the Abuja Division of the court, on September 20, 2017, made an interim order proscribing IPOB and designating it as a terrorist group.

The court’s decision followed an ex parte application by the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr. Abubakar Malami (SAN), to that effect.

But in its motion filed before the same judge on September 22, 2017 IPOB contended that the proscription order made by the court was unconstitutional.

The motion was anchored on 13 grounds, first of which was that the proscription order was made without jurisdiction “as the order was granted against an entity (IPOB) unknown to the (Nigerian) law.”

IPOB’s lawyer, Mr. Ifeanyi Ejiofor, had submitted that IPOB was only registered in seven other countries and not in Nigeria and as such the group could not sue or be sued in Nigeria.

The AGF office subsequently filed a counter-affidavit justifying the proscription order of the court.

Justice Kafarati heard the two parties on November 14, 2017 after which he adjourned until January 18, 2018 for ruling.

Delivering his ruling on IPOB’s application, on January 18, the judge resolved all the three formulated issues against the group, and held that the September 20, 2017 proscription order of the court was validly issued.

The judge also awarded the sum of N500,000 as cost against IPOB for filing the “unmeritorious” application.

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.