Stake Holders Lash Out on “Single Term” Move By The National Assembly


Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

The Presidency over the weekend said the clause in the proposed constitution amendment, which seeks to exclude the President and some governors from participating in the 2015 elections, would fail, this was said by Dr. Ahmed Gulak, Special Adviser to the President on Political Matters

He said, “It is not a fair amendment to target a particular group of people. That proposal will not scale through because Nigerians are wiser.

“You can’t short- some people in the name of amending the constitution. I am sure there will be some considerations and the proposal will fail.

“The President and some governors were elected under a constitution that allows them to contest two terms of four years each. You can’t change the rule midway.”

Similarly, the Arewa Consultative Forum opposed the six year-single tenure for the president and governors as proposed by the Senate Committee on the Review of the Constitution.

The apex northern socio-political body cautioned members of the National Assembly against adopting it.

It argued that adopting such a provision would be counterproductive because it was capable of impeding good governance in the country.

National Publicity Secretary of the ACF, Mr. Anthony Sani, said in Kaduna, that apart from good governance, the proposal lacked the basic elements of motivation and incentives needed in the management of human affairs.

He said, “ACF’s position on single tenure for president and governors is that it is counterproductive, because it has no incentives to motivate for excellence.

“This is because the good, the not-so-good and the feckless are grouped together without any exception.

“All management of human affairs which has no way of rewarding excellent performance cannot reasonably be expected to be effective.

“In multiple tenure, re-election is often a form of reward for good performance. And if the president and governors know that they are all entitled to only six years whether they perform or not, they will concentrate on the pillage of public treasury, which is counterproductive.”

Opposition political parties shared similar views.

In separate interviews, the Action Congress of Nigeria and the Congress for Progressive Change, said two terms of four years each as was currently being practised, was better.

National Publicity Secretary of the ACN, Lai Mohammed, said, “The position of our party has been consistent, two terms of four years each.

“There is nothing wrong with the system. What does the preclusion of Jonathan and governors from participating from the 2015 elections got to do with anything?

“Six years is a long time in politics. The beauty of democracy is not only in the ability of the people to participate in voting in a people to govern them but also in their power to vote out non-performing governments.

“What prevents somebody who comes in on the six-year single term bait from seeking to make it three terms of six years each? What stops another National Assembly coming in to change the constitution again?

“Without prejudice to what they are proposing, we are of the view that the clause dealing with the issue of tenure is fine as it is.”

Speaking in a similar vein, his counterpart in the CPC, Mr. Rotimi Fahakin, said, “You know the President who started this tenure thing probably thought he would benefit from it. He has been told bluntly by the Senate, that this is not going to be.

“For us, I wouldn’t really know the problem this amendment to the constitution hopes to solve in our political system.

“What we have always known is that the people should always be the fulcrum of any political decision we want to take.

“The current two terms of four years each if properly used like it is done in advanced democracies like the United States, is good enough for our own environment; in that it keeps the people as the focus of the democratic value of our political system.”

Meanwhile, the Ijaw Youth Council has said President Jonathan must contest the 2015 election irrespective of the recommendations of the committee.

The IYC insisted that the President’s aspiration for a second term in office must not be scuttled by the Senate.

“We are saying that Jonathan must run in 2015 because he is a saleable candidate for us. The National Assembly should not do anything that will affect the second term ambition of President Jonathan and others who wish to contest in 2015.

“Though we cannot compel Nigerians to vote for him (Jonathan), we are appealing to Nigerians to vote for him in the next dispensation.  He must contest no matter the recommendations from that committee.”

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.